Order order / order down (copy)
Case No.- 30/2018 Date-11/03/2018
Date |
Order no | The order is given | Signature |
11-03-2018
|
01
|
The complaints were documented. Both parties were ordered to appear on the next date, including the evidence of the dispute, through notice. Date: 22/03/2018
|
|
22-03-2018
|
02 |
The plaintiff appeared before the court. The defendant's average appearance date 29/03/2018.
|
|
29-03-2018
|
03
|
The plaintiff appeared. The average of the defendants appeared. Next date dated 02/04/2018.
|
|
02-04-2018
|
04
|
The plaintiff appeared. The average of the defendants appeared The defendant does not appear in court even after giving notice to the defendant, and the defendant does not accept notice if he is at home to issue a notice to the village police. The court deferred the court because the defendant did not accept the notice. Since the defendant was not present, Ward No 3, Lutfar Rahman, was ordered to submit a report on the complaint to the complainant on 08/04/2018. Date: 09/04/2018 |
|
09-04-2018 |
05
|
Ward no 3 member Lutfar Rahman submitted the report and saw the plaintiff's complaint was reviewed. The actual fact is that in the district of Dinajpur district, Charkai Mouza of Chirakai Mouza of Khar, Khulia No. 667, of the total number of scandal with 66 percent of the property was acquired by the owner of Hasan Hossain Mandal in the possession of the Recycled owner, the register was filed on 09/07/1943, 9462, registering the destruction of the closing documents, it was originally sold to Abdus Sattar. Further, Abdus Sattar Mondal Khariya at Kharia at Charakai Mauja during the last SS The eighth house of 2893 was registered under the name of Abdus Sattar Mondal. When Abdus Sattar Mondal proposed to sell his property, he passed the possession of Akkas Ali Sardar on the basis of purchase of the last 25/12/1964 and transmitted the copy of the closing of the closing of 7625 on 30/12/1964 to 30/12/1964. Then Akkas Ali, while enjoying the possession, transferred the document dated 10/05/1965, along with M Mansur Ali, and removed the occupation. In the possession of the accused property Mansur Ali, the owner of the house, in the possession of the deceased, said that on March 11, 2011, the 5051 registration number of the petition was handed over to the accused. Disclaimer of his property by his own name, loyalty whose case no. LX-l / 1075 / 11-12, owned by Khatian no-816 and the present field survey, and the possession of the plaintiff, in the name of Badi, DPP 1188 was correctly published and circulated and the plaintiff At present, cultivating paddy cultivation of Rabi 8 On the other side, the defendant party has never grab the property of the complaining property. The defendant is trying to destroy the crops of complaining property. The case was registered in absence of the defendants after repeated notice. The plaintiff was advised to be a high court judge
|
|
Planning and Implementation: Cabinet Division, A2I, BCC, DoICT and BASIS